Skip to main content

Topic: The Department of Urban Affairs (Read 12379 times)

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
The Department of Urban Affairs
This thread is about cities and civilised life; the centralised conglomeration of constructions and the people who live in or under them, as well as the people passing by; their planners, shapers, and runners; their light, their shade and activities; their impact on the world around them and on each other; citizen getting along or across with citizen; their tools, trade, and technology; their growth and decay; and whatever else it takes to finish this sentence.

Be urbane.

  • Belfrager
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #150
I've done duck, chicken,[1] and fish. But the free hunter still needs to realize that the forest strawberry is edible.  :P
Hunters were also gatherers , you can eat your strawberries in peace. :)
A matter of attitude.

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #151
Some urban beauty contests, starting with the EIU liveability ranking.

The EIU ranking is based on a selection of 140 cities worldwide ranked on five criteria, Stability (25%), Healthcare (20%), Culture & Environment (25%), Education (10%), Infrastructure (20%). And the 2016 winners are:

  • Melbourne, Australia
  • Vienna, Austria
  • Vancouver, Canada
  • Toronto, Canada
  • Calgary, Canada
  • Adelaide, Australia
  • Perth, Australia
  • Auckland, New Zealand
  • Helsinki, Finland
  • Hamburg, Germany

Or in video form:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q2x9upK6oGU


But these 140 cities have actually become less liveable, as the cities in decline have lost more than the other cities have improved.

Most improved cities over five years (ranking) ∆ score
  • Tehran Iran (126) +5.0
  • Dubai UAE (74) +4.6
  • Harare Zimbabwe (133) +4.4
  • Abidjan Cote d'Ivoire (128) +3.8
  • Kuwait City Kuwait (81)  +2.5
  • Kathmandu Nepal (124) +2.3
  • Warsaw Poland (65) +2.1
  • Bratislava Slovakia (63) +1.7
  • Baku Azerbaijan (103) +1.6
  • Honolulu US (17) +1.3


Greatest decline over five years (ranking) ∆ score
  • Damascus Syria (140)  -26.1 
  • Kiev Ukraine (131)  -25.1 
  • Detroit US (57) -5.7 
  • Moscow Russia (80) -5.6 
  • Bahrain Bahrain (91) -4.6 
  • Tripoli Libya (139) -4.5 
  • St Petersburg Russia (76) -4.4 
  • Paris France (32) -3.7 
  • Athens Greece (69) -3.4 
  • Caracas Venezuela (123) -3.3

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #152
Then a branding agency has made a ranking of the world's most reputable cities.

They have polled 23,000 people in the G8 countries, and ranked 55 cities based on 23 criteria in esteem, economy, environment, and government. Further details are not available.

  • Sydney
  • Vienna
  • Zürich
  • Toronto
  • Stockholm
  • Edinburgh
  • Montreal
  • Rome
  • Vancouver
  • Copenhagen
  • Helsinki
  • Venice
  • Melbourne
  • Barcelona
  • Madrid
  • Frankfurt
  • Amsterdam
  • San Francisco
  • Tokyo
  • Dublin

The six cities at the bottom are: New Delhi, Istanbul, Mexico City, Moscow, Rio de Janeiro, Cairo.

  • ersi
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #153
Edinburgh
Are you sure it shouldn't be Glasgow there?

  • Belfrager
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #154
a branding agency
Information to trust about.
A matter of attitude.

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #155
An alternative approach to bike sharing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WMkqVZ-EpG0

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #156
One cool consequence is that when you get rid of the racks you also make the system provider-independent, there could be different and independent schemes providing you with the bicycle of choice.

----------

This Wired Future City feature on Shenzhen could fit in many places, China, technology, history of technology, politics, but ultimately it is about urban affairs.

https://youtu.be/SGJ5cZnoodY

  • Frenzie
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
Re: The Department of Urban Affairs
Reply #157
One cool consequence is that when you get rid of the racks you also make the system provider-independent, there could be different and independent schemes providing you with the bicycle of choice.
I think the racks are primarily about ensuring availability,[1] although of course it also keeps the amount of technology that can fail lower. There may be a 100,000 bikes in Shanghai, but what if there isn't a single one near you? (Apologies if the vid mentioned; I only skimmed it which is more effective in reading.)
Meaning things like trucking them around from one collection point to another, or into the shop as necessary based on the number of km, etc.