Skip to main content

Topic: Split links (Read 492 times)

  • jax
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Global Moderator
Split links
This message refers to Jimbro's earlier message:

This kind of language doesn't belong here, Belfrager.

It's not needed that's for sure. But as it's the "free speech" thread, I'll try to ignore it. Not that I am condoning it though Belfrager.
Quoting it, doesn't really help matters.


Unfortunately for that reference Jimbro's message had just split. but the reference had taken no notice of that. It said
Code: [Select]
1019.msg41789#msg41789 
but would have needed to be
Code: [Select]
1304.msg41789#msg41789
for the link to actually work, 1304 being the new thread.


In other words this would have been unbroken:

This kind of language doesn't belong here, Belfrager.

It's not needed that's for sure. But as it's the "free speech" thread, I'll try to ignore it. Not that I am condoning it though Belfrager.
Quoting it, doesn't really help matters.


  • Frenzie
  • [*][*][*][*][*]
  • Administrator
Re: Split links
Reply #1
The current version of SMF stems from 2011. I wonder if the 2.1 beta, to which we'll upgrade after it stabilizes more, includes something like that.