I consider catering to evolution denial to be a milestone, remember Bantay, not because it mattered that much in itself, it only meant that Republicans would be less likely to be biologists. But it led to party increasingly less comfortable with science, and we can draw a line from there to GQP.
I refuse to be dragged into the Republican-radical culture war, it is froth, turbulence, and waste of energy. "Intersectionality" is somewhat fact-based, though when the word is broached, it's a flag that what follows has a non-zero probability of being nonsense.
As I said earlier, I think it silently started with Watergate, which was an extremely scandalous Republican power-grabbing conspiracy. They have been trying to mount something equally scandalous against Democrats ever since, which only takes the entire country down the spiral.
Quote from: ersi on 2021-05-03, 15:07:27As I said earlier, I think it silently started with Watergate, which was an extremely scandalous Republican power-grabbing conspiracy. They have been trying to mount something equally scandalous against Democrats ever since, which only takes the entire country down the spiral.What about interpreting it as a resurgence of the Old Right? It's always remained as a minority.
whose main distinguishing feature is isolationism (the foreign policy is to stick the head in sand and keep it there), has had no representatives in higher power for over a century.
The real example of Republican lunacy is everything anti-Democrat
[A]n extremely scandalous Republican power-grabbing conspiracy[,]
-- traditions of self-government, free speech, religious toleration, the right of free assembly; and that bugaboo of the left, property rights.(Not to mention the right to "keep and bear" arms, since authoritarians of all stripes abhor such...To you, ersi, these are pretensions?
exactly the same as Democrats
Or do you actually believe the nonsense promulgated by the Hillary Clinton campaign? That she lost the election because of Russian "interference" and its collusion with the Trump campaign?
How many years were spent on chasing the Clinton Chimera called "Russian collusion"?
The difficulty inherent in "this topic" is the result of flagrant abuses of power by politicians (guess: from which party...?) and their fellow should-be felons in the Intelligence Community.
If your "sources" can't reach or won't touch the sworn testimony given to the House Intelligence Committee and the House Judiciary Committee leading up to the first Trump impeachment trial, their unnamed "highly placed" pontificators are blowing smoke.
[T]he abuse of power by Trump of getting rid of Comey?
And Mueller, a Republican, is the should-be felon?
I gave you my sources.
You cite YouTube video to support innuendo, and expect me to rebut it? Is that a standard of "justice" you're comfortable with?
so I won't bother you with any advanced and more complicated evidence :)
Page created in 0.070 seconds with 40 queries.